|
|
Rabbi
Moshe Chaim Luzzato
writes
that the quest and thirst for truth are inherent in
the
very creatio n of man, but the attainment of true
understanding is not possible without study. It is not
something mystical, reserved for the fortunate few who may
hit upon it. Rather, it is the product of patient and
painstaking cultivation of our inherent intellectual
powers. The study of how ideas are conceived and how
misconception can lead us astray is called the art of
logic. Even the untrained mind will constantly produce new
thoughts and ideas, but the first thought which occurs to
us is not always the one which is true, even if we are
inclined to hold that view tenaciously as our own. On the
contrary, our ideas approach closer to the truth only as a
result of a cultivated and conscious application of the
rules of logic. The following is the authors
introduction and first chapter from our English
translation. The complete book can be ordered from the Feldheim Publisher's web site: http://www.feldheim.com.
The
Book of Logic
Introduction
Click
here for more excerpts of The Book of Logic
When we behold the
manifold creations of this earth, and the portion that has
been given each of them, we see that God has given man the
greatest portion of all. For man has a tremendous role to
refine and bring to fruition the entire world. We can go so
far as to say that in relation to man's role, God's Creation
itself was merely a sort of beginning in a potential state;
but the actual fulfillment is completely given over to man.
Our Sages of blessed memory have already awakened us to this
truth in their saying, "All that was created in the six days
of Creation needs improvement. Wheat must be ground into
flour. Lupine must be made sweet," and so on (Bereshis
Rabbah, Parashah 11:6). Further, we find that Turnus Rufus,
the Roman, once asked Rabbi Akiva, "What is finer, the
handiwork of the Almighty or that of human beings?" He
answered him, "The works of flesh and blood are finer."
Then, to prove his point, he brought him sheaves of grain
and fine wheat cakes and said to the Roman philosopher,
"Which of these is the finer?" (Midrash Tanchuma, Parashas
Ishah Ki Sazria 6).
In fact, it is
apparent to everyone that although all things follow their
natural laws when they are left in a state of nature;
nevertheless they cannot reach perfection without man's
exertion and work. When man intervenes, he helps their
nature and guides their development in a proper direction,
so that the result is certain to be more perfect and
refined. This is an obvious principle. By way of example,
the fruit of any tree left to its nature without cultivation
will not equal in taste and beauty the fruit of a tree which
is cultivated, even though the tree will yield some small
fruit according to its particular kind. Also the soil which
is not cultivated, neither manured nor ploughed, will not
yield produce at all, or at best will provide only lean and
imperfect produce. This is the general rule except for a few
instances where the natural fertility is so great that there
is hardly any need of work. In conclusion, the Creator,
blessed be He, has left room for us to distinguish ourselves
as much as we are able by perfecting through our labor that
which has been given us by nature.
Furthermore, the
uncultivated tree and the uncultivated soil provide a
metaphor which applies to the intellect of man itself. Even
with the ability to reason which is inherent in it by
nature, the uncultivated intellect will be like the tree
which is not cared for and like the soil which is neglected.
For, even though the mind does not stop producing many
thoughts, like the tree that does not stop giving the fruit
which is particular to it, the untrained intellect will
still not equal the mind that is cultivated, just like the
fruit of a wild tree is not equal to cultivated fruit. Thus
the intellect needs training and study in every element of
reality, that is, in all those concepts which are its
occupation, for without this the intellect will not fulfill
its potential. Also it is necessary to study the process of
understanding itself so that the mind can grasp ideas in a
way that is complete and straight, and not lacking or
confused.
Consequently, to this
end, the Rabbis before us have labored to arrange the
categories of the intellect and to explain its rules
correctly, with special consideration for whatever accidents
can befall the intellect, both those which lead to lucidity
and those which lead to foolishness — what helps the mind to
form a true picture and what misleads us into false
understanding. In this way we may know what there is to
guard against in our thinking so that the intellect will not
err, and also what is helpful to aid the mind to grasp the
truth. The whole of this study is what is called the art of
logic.
Thus, when I saw the
great need which, in truth, there is for this subject, I
chose to arrange this study in a concise form including as
much as seemed necessary for the completeness of the matter.
For without the art of logic, it is impossible to enter into
the inner chambers of wisdom and to enjoy her subtleties.
Most of this work I have compiled from books which preceded
me in other languages, and I have brought it into our
language for the benefit of our people. Certain things I
have added, subtracted, and changed from what I found before
me when it seemed to me more proper. Therefore, gentle
reader, stop at each section to consider it well, take heed
to increase your understanding, and this knowledge of logic
will give pleasure to your spirit.
Chapter One
The art of logic in
its entirety. Its definition and the need for it. The
distinction between sensible and intelligible realities.
Abstract and speculative realities. The division of reality
into concept and fantasy.
1 It is apparent to
all that the entire labor of the intellect and its striving
is to perceive things according to their true natures.
However, the intellect may err and thus arrive at false
conclusions. Therefore, a special study is needed to
recognize and guard against the pitfalls into which it is
possible to stumble so that our perceptions should be true.
This study in its entirety is called the art of logic.
2 The most basic
function of the mind in its quest for the knowledge of
things is the process of differentiation, to the point of
recognizing each thing by itself distinct and separate from
everything else. But, inasmuch as all elements of reality
have within them aspects similar to one another and aspects
which are different, it follows that the intellect will not
reach the goal of its work unless it is trained in two
activities, namely, comparison and differentiation.
3 Mistakes can occur
in either one of these two activities when one compares what
is not similar or differentiates between things which are
not in reality different. Hence, in both activities, study
and exercise and systematic rules are necessary to set our
reason on the straight path and not stray from it until the
desired goal has been achieved.
4 All the elements of
reality are divided into two parts: one is the sensible or
perceivable; the other is the intelligible. Perceptive
reality is perceived with one of our senses. Intelligible
reality is what the mind sees by its faculty of imagination.
However, things which are imagined or thought do not exist
per se in reality outside the mind. Intelligible reality is
also divided into two categories: one is the abstract; the
other is the speculative.
An example of the
perceptive is "the stone" or "the tree," things which are
seen by the senses. Examples of the intelligible would be
things like wisdom, memory, or strength, things which we
understand and perceive in our mind, but our senses do not
perceive them in the external reality.
5 Abstract reality is
what cannot be conceived by the senses except in conjunction
with something else but it is abstracted by the intellect
and isolated by itself. Speculative reality is something
which cannot be conceived from the senses at all, either by
itself or in conjunction with something else. Only the mind
visualizes it. Speculative reality is also divided into two
parts: the first is concept; the second is fantasy.
An example of the
abstract is color. White, black, or any other color is never
seen by the senses as an independent entity; it only exists
as an attribute of something. The mind, however, pictures
whiteness as a separate entity superimposed on the body in
which it is found. Thus we say that the mind abstracts
whiteness from the body in which it is a quality and forms
what we call an abstract concept. However, the speculative
is not related to the senses in this way, as we will see in
the next paragraph.
6 The first category
of the speculative is concept. A Concept is something whose
existence cannot be established through the senses.
Nevertheless, it is proper to say that it exists according
to its level of abstraction between speculative and
perceptive reality. Accordingly, our perceptions of reality
tend to be ordered around concepts.
The second category is
Fantasy, which neither exists nor can it be said to exists,
and perception can in no way be ordered around it.
In other words, a
concept is an evaluation of a reality which we do not see,
but it is, nevertheless, drawn from the tangible world.
For example, we
observe that human beings exist and that they are alive; we
also see animals, and they too are alive, and so also are
birds. We conclude that there is a certain species of
creature called the species of Living things. Now this
species is not a real entity apart from these particulars
which we have mentioned. The intellect, however, imagines
that it does exist, as if there existed one such general
species divided into particular subspecies. In fact,
according to the logical scheme, the general is prior to the
particular. This may be compared to a tree and its branches.
Thus, our perceptive reality follows in the scheme of things
after the speculative, as if the speculative concept were
the trunk of a tree and the perceptive reality the branches
from it. The situation is entirely different in the case of
fantasy. It is altogether speculative, and there is nothing
in the perceptive reality upon which we can base the
existence of this fantasy. |